Tag: Big Data

  • Flotsam and Jetsam #1: On Cheneys and Chains

    One of the reasons I post on this blog ao infreqently is that my standards for my own writing are so restrictive as to be paralyzing. So many would-be posts bubble up, only to fail to fully materialize, or the window of their relevance closes before they can. If I could give myself permission to just write without worrying about how tightly composed it is, this might actually become a blog rather than an archive of occasional articles.

    So I’m trying something new starting today. A new kind of post (for me) where I’ll basically just vomit up whatever’s really pressing against my consciousness: crazy observations, responses to political garbage, philosophical meanderings, down whatever trail the Hunter leads…

    Liz Cheney, Trump, and Liberal Alarmism

    This is one of those things I’m talking about after the moment has passed, especially post-election, but I gotta get it out. Democrats and liberal media were up in arms over Trump’s supposedly violent statements toward Liz Cheney, in which he said her usual warhawk orientation would be different if the guns (presumably those of enemy soldiers) were pointed at her.

    She is a radical war hawk. Let’s put her with a rifle standing there with nine barrels shooting at her, OK? Let’s see how she feels about it. You know, when the guns are trained on her face.

    The context was Cheney’s penchant for supporting U.S. wars abroad, like her father before her. And context aside, these words in themselves do not constitute a threat. The guns in question are not held by Trump himself or any of his proxies. There is no plan here, no order, nothing. It is hypothetical because of course Liz Cheney would never see a battlefield, hyperbolic, and in total disregard for the establishment’s rules of decorum, as is Trump’s well-worn style.

    Listen. I’m old enough to remember — it was only 16 years ago! — when George W. Bush and his ilk were public enemies for the liberal establishment. That he’s somehow managed to launder that image and retire as some more reasonable elder statesman who paints mediocre pictures in his spare time does not change the fact he — and main man Dick — are responsible for hundreds of thousands of deaths from a war waged under false pretenses. Or their responsibility for the economic crash of 2008 and the annihilation of generations of Black wealth. It was popular back then to cast Bush as a moron, and so the thinking was that it was Cheney and Powell and Rumsfeld and Wolfowitz and Rove and whoever else pulling his strings.

    As far as Liz goes, the apple doesn’t fall far, and somehow, we’re supposed to forget her family’s war profiteering legacy because she stands guard at the Right Gate to defend the establishment, which apparently has grown so big (coalition is the word they use) that Bernie Sanders guards the Left Gate? And pundits are still confused as to why an antiestablishment firestarter like Trump resonated with so many?

    About Those Slavery Texts

    When I first read the story about these racist mass texts telling Black people all over the country to report to the nearest plantation…can I be real with y’all for a minute?

    I cracked up laughing. I’m laughing now.

    There were a few reasons for this. First was that this was so obviously a trolling of epic proportions that no serious person could actually think… Well, more on that in a minute.

    Second, I’m sure whatever clever little roach thought this up is sitting somewhere all smug and self-satisfied at the outrage. He or they won the minute this became a national story. And I’m not gonna give him the satisfaction.

    Third, it was so asinine that it triggered some juvenile funny bone, and I just couldn’t help myself.

    Also funny, but in the sobering sense that black and white people functionally live on separate planets, is this bit from a CNN article:

    Attorneys general in Washington, DC, Virginia, New Jersey, Illinois and Maryland have condemned the messages and urged those who feel under threat to contact law enforcement.

    Bruh. What? Do otherwise (presumably) intelligent people shit their brains out when it comes to the police? Absent a recent protest about another execution of a Black person by a cop, or forgetting the mass mobilizations of 4 years ago, or forgetting or perhaps somehow never knowing what even the National Law Enforcement Museum admits on their website, that the origin of the modern US police is in the practice of slave catching? In what bizarro world would a Black person in the United States of America, fearing being forced into slavery, turn to the very institution which enforced it and has since presided over a regime of Black oppression and murder for generations? What the fuck are these people even saying?

    But here’s the thing that all the coverage of this story seems to miss, which is far more ominous and far more important. This person or people, with presumably far fewer resources than the Trump campaign (if we take them at their word they they weren’t involved), were able to send targeted communications to a large number of people, knowing their names and racial identities.

    The real story here is about data. Who has access to it and what they can do with it. I suspect this was an exploitation of the same infrastructure that brought us all the election campaign texts. At some point I gave the wrong person or entity my name and phone number, and that, paired with my recent history of holding my nose while voting for Democrats, opened me up to the most aggressive, relentless, spammy text assault I’ve ever experienced. Just how many people have my information? And whose job is to identify and protect my data from bad actors?

    I can imagine a scenario in which some unsuspecting Black voters, participating in some phone survey or exit poll, had their name, race, and contact info logged in some database somewhere, for political spam purposes, and then that database — likely with less security than the many large companies experiencing data breaches of late — was somehow compromised and the Clever Roach found their opportunity to troll a bunch of Black people, the FBI, the media, the NAACP, and everyone else up in arms about this dumb shit. The timing is likely not a coincidence.

    And the Kids Are Not Alright

    That all said, the most damage done — as much by those continuing to give the story air as the original troll — seems to have been to young people, who through a combination of social media virality (and the related capitalization on outrage and fear) their own lack of digital literacy, and what seems to be a deep sense of fatalism and powerlessness, came to believe that the reinstitution of slavery — without a country-collapsing war — is even a possibility.

    What it also signifies is a failure of public education, our mass media, and popular culture, at least insofar as it applies to adequate representations of history. From To Kill a Mockingbird, to 12 Years a Slave, many of us, and perhaps young people especially, have internalized this false narrative in which millions of Black people were brutally enslaved and mostly accepted their plight without resistance. Disarmed with this version of history, one might reasonably assume that were it not for the infinite good will and impeccable morality of the white people in the northern states, that we would’ve been enslaved for another fifty years. That we, today, by a shift in our good fortunes, a depletion of that good white will, or the rise of a fascist president, might be enslaved again. Without resistance.

    In this version of history there were a few outliers — hell, maybe only one by the name of Harriet Tubman — but the rest of us by and large accepted our fate. They probably haven’t heard the names of Nat Turner or Denmark Vesey, or understand that resistance was actually not the exclusive province of a handful of radicals, but a deeply embedded praxis that took any number of forms. Forms that echo into the present: the resistance inherent to carving out dignified lives under siege in the imperial core from forces social, political, and economic. Finding joy, creating art, shaping culture, making worlds. It reminds me that in their bid to render young people as fungible sites of social reproduction, schools have foreclosed on their horizons of possibility: where a return to slavery is more feasible than a thriving life.

    So for all that — all that — I say to the Clever Roach: bring your white van to my block, homey, and…let’s see how you feel when the guns are trained on your face.

    Now that’s a threat. It’s also a mother fucking promise.

  • Learn, Predict, Steer: The God That Google Made

    Learn, Predict, Steer: The God That Google Made

    It was sometime in 2012 that I began to deeply distrust Google. Because of what I saw as the trajectory of their business model, with respect to Big Data:

    LEARN. PREDICT. STEER.

    PHASE 1: LEARN — Google would collect as much data as it could on every person who used their services, and conceivably, every person on the planet. Contacts, locations, travel patterns, email, text messages, phone calls, consumer habits, interests, concerns, political ideologies, religious affiliations, family relationships, occupations, and so much more.

    PHASE 2: PREDICT — With so much data collected, and through the use of complex algorithms and artificial intelligence, Google would anticipate the thoughts and actions of its users (and everyone else), and make convenient suggestions based on what it extrapolated their wants or needs to be in the moment.

    PHASE 3: STEER — Deferring to the almighty power of the algorithm, Google would start to influence people’s actions, conceivably in directions that represented their own interests, motivations, ideologies, and so on.

    This idea sprung fully formed from my mind after an experience with what was then called “Google Now”, and then evolved into the Google Assistant. One day, I walked to the corner store, and my phone prompted me with transit directions to my partner’s house. That corner was indeed where I would catch a trolley, but this “suggestion” unnerved me. I didn’t like the idea of this machine, or the company behind it, knowing enough about me as to predict what I would do next. Thus began a long process, with many relapses, to remove Google from my life.

    It was an ambitious goal. Because Google was ubiquitous, pervasive, and in so many cases, offered the best tech solutions for various everyday “problems”. Problems, mind you, which really didn’t exist before Google made itself so indispensably convenient.

    Then in May of 2018, a strange internal video leaked from Google. It was called The Selfish Ledger, made by members of the company’s experimental wing, “Google X” — afterward just X, a subsidiary of parent company, Alphabet.

    There were many voices clamoring to comment on this provocative “thought experiment”, but I had a different take. As I watched the video, my anti-Google impulses went into overdrive.

    See! I knew it!”

    It seemed to validate my theories about Google’s trajectory, in spite of the company’s official statement that the Selfish Ledger was a mere “thought experiment”. However, I felt something else, too.  Maybe because of the music or images, or because it was talking about memetics — a major interest of mine — I was also highly engaged, even mesmerized.

    As the narrator laid out his dystopian vision with a pleasant British accent, I felt vaguely placated and a sense of awe. I thought ahead to the world the video envisioned, and some part of me felt at peace in the thought of relinquishing control, of allowing some gentle overseer to guide me. Much of this had to do with the vulnerability that arises out of life being so difficult at times, but I think it also invoked something deeper and endemic to the human condition. The same impulse that pushes people toward religion, or toward the stars. Toward all things mysterious and greater than ourselves.

    If I, as non-religious person, who was hyper-skeptical of Google and its designs, felt such a thing, I could only imagine how easy it would be for most people to slide into the sort of complacency envisioned by the video. Because Google, without question, made life easier. At some point, it even made phone calls on our behalf. There was a slippery slope between convenience and dependency.

    The video had a disingenuous — and rather pretentious way — of talking about a process that has already been taking place for the whole of human history. The process that sets humans apart from all other animals. The “Lamarckian data” which might be mapped and understood to predict and steer human behavior is exactly what Richard Dawkins called memes. These “selfish replicators”, analogous to genes, exist independently of Google’s ability to track them, and are already passed on from one generation to the next. What the video called the Selfish Ledger, we already knew under a different name.

    CULTURE.

    Google was proposing they act as the custodians, the mediators, the purveyors of human culture — stored, analyzed, and transmitted as “data” — and conceivably modifying it along the way. Not just on the broad, collective level, but on a deep, hyper-personal, individual level. Where humans have long sought a total understanding and thereby a mastery over nature, Google would be the stewards of our nurture.  Analogous to GMOs, perhaps we would become “CMOs” (culturally modified organisms), or maybe MMOs (memetically modified).

    I thought about the implications of this corporate AI Overseer guiding thoughts, emotions, opinions, consumer habits, politics, public policy, among many other things, including the very modes of human interaction and our reasons for doing anything at all.

    And to me, it sounded like:

    PHASE 4: CONTROL — manipulate the thoughts and emotions, dictate the actions, drive the behaviors of users under the pretext of what’s best for them, and the world.

    It sounded like a “benevolent” dictator, but one with far more insight into people’s thoughts and emotions on an individual and collective level than any human or their administration could ever manage.

    It sounded like a god.

    Not merely the kind Neil Gaiman postulated in his novel, American Gods, competing for our attention and brain space, but an actual force that actively and constantly intervened in our lives to determine their outcomes. A god that was functionally omnipotent, with respect to its power over human lives, and one that already was omnipresent.

    It seemed particularly salient given the explanation of how our data would live independently of us as people, as the substrate with which this god molded the world and society. How it imagined future generations being born into a world already shaped and guided by data and algorithms and the artificial intelligence that made meaning of it all.

    I briefly wandered down a philosophical rabbit hole, considering that this god had long existed in some other form, perhaps laying dormant in the collective unconscious, until humans and their technology gave it the means to manifest with agency in the physical world.

    At some point, we had a choice as to how much of our personal information we offered up to the new god. Though it was neither as much choice as we would have liked, nor as much as Google led us to believe. Future generations would not have much choice at all, because the Infernal Machine had already started unwinding. Their input had little influence over the new direction of the world, driven as it was by the momentum of millions of data points from billions of people over many years.

    The ideas presented in the video were both awe-inspiring, and terrifying, as one imagined a god must be.

    The God That Google Made. Past tense. Because I am imagining a future where the Selfish Ledger has already become a reality. A future that looks back on all the omens that signaled the rise of this digital god, and our failure to do anything about it.

    Or perhaps our inability to do anything, once a certain line was crossed. But where was the line? When we, as a society, shrugged at any revelation that our every thought and action was being tracked by private companies and used to manipulate us? Or was it when artificial intelligence algorithms started to function in ways their programmers did not predict or anticipate? There was a chilling irony in that. Or maybe with the advent of quantum computing, which allowed these digital minds to function at speeds and levels of efficiency that humans could barely comprehend, let alone control.

    That future was not as far away as we thought, with respect to time or the ethical distance Google placed between “thought experiment” and company policy. The slide into complacency and dependency had already begun, and was accelerating at an exponential rate.

    There were scattered and muted critiques from some technologists, and from anyone who ever regarded science fiction about artificial intelligence as cautionary tales. But by and large, the new god’s arrival was met with fanfare and devotion. While venom and bile was reserved for any who dared a more heretical interpretation of what the future held. A future that would inevitably see the proliferation of creepy robots*.

    As I considered the many ways humans could and probably would be complicit in our own destruction, the quest to “Un-Google” my life continued…

    _____________________

    * Boston Dynamics, the robotics company behind “Atlas”, was owned by Google X until 2017.